BlogOpine

High Pitched Conversations: How Loudness Can Drown Meaning

Since the time I became conscious of the outer world, and communication became a part of life, I have lived in a state of confusion—especially during moments when the pitch of conversation rose. Time and again, I realized that as the pitch increased, meaning collapsed. The more I was silenced through these high pitches, the more I replayed these conversations in my mind, as if the truth I carried had been left unheard. With time, I began to retreat from situations where people possessed less power to listen and more inclination to speak. But I often wondered: does this happen to others too? Do some people choose to remain within their inner corpus? And does silence, in a world governed by noise, alienate us?

The Social Economy of Volume In social gatherings, classrooms, political debates, and even domestic spaces, volume is often mistaken for conviction. Loudness garners authority; it steals attention and asserts dominance. Those who speak softly—or hesitate before speaking—are frequently perceived as unsure or unintelligent. In contrast, loud speech, even when hollow, is applauded. The consequence? Nuance is lost. Listening diminishes. Meaning disintegrates.

This isn’t just an interpersonal problem. It’s a cultural one.

Art as Refuge, Then Pressure As I delved deeper into art—more than academia—my consciousness sharpened. I found relief in the company of those who discovered themselves in their art. But even here, society had a demand: to extract the ‘voice’ from the art, and make the artist speak—often louder than they wanted to. The expectation wasn’t just for creation, but for declaration. Why must art be explained in raised voices? Why isn’t the work enough?

When Writers Whisper Instead of Shout The literary world is full of those who have chosen silence, subtlety, and pause over projection. Virginia Woolf, in A Room of One’s Own, examines the ways women’s thoughts have been interrupted—both literally and intellectually—by louder male voices. Her critique of patriarchal interruption remains piercingly relevant today.

Similarly, Franz Kafka’s protagonists navigate quiet alienation in a world too loud to notice their unraveling. Their inner voices are never heard by the system they exist within. Silence, in his work, isn’t a lack—it’s a response to a world where volume no longer guarantees connection.

Even James Baldwin, whose voice is now iconic, wrote often about silence as survival. In The Fire Next Time, he speaks of the “despair” of being unheard—not because one hasn’t spoken, but because the world refuses to hear anything that isn’t shouted.

Closer home, Rabindranath Tagore wrote with musical restraint—choosing rhythm over roar. His characters often communicated through silences, withheld emotions, and paused gestures. In a society craving slogans, he insisted on lyricism.

Echoes from the Past: Loudness vs. Meaning

  • Socrates, in the Athenian Assembly, practiced quiet questioning. But his refusal to conform to the dominant oratory led to his execution—proof that calm reason threatens a society addicted to noise.
  • Bhagat Singh, during his trial, chose silence when asked for remorse. His stillness was louder than slogans—yet was misread by many.
  • Amrita Sher-Gil’s portraits captured women in silence. Critics often dismissed them for not being politically loud enough, but their stillness was the statement.

A Culture of Interrupted Conversations When meanings are interrupted—when truths are shouted over—what is lost is not just a sentence or a story, but sometimes, a soul. Silence, then, becomes a terrain of exile. People withdraw not because they have nothing to say, but because they cannot compete with noise.

This is why many continue to dwell inside their corpus, speaking more with their brushstrokes, verses, and melodies than with amplified voices. Their resistance is not in confrontation but in creating.

Conclusion: Listening as Radical Practice In a time when loudness is often mistaken for wisdom, choosing to listen is an act of radical empathy. Artists, writers, and thinkers who speak softly or not at all are not empty. They are full of meaning that resists being shouted. Perhaps the most important conversations are the ones we never get to finish, or the ones we carry in silence.

To truly connect, we must learn to hear the unsaid, to value the whispered, and to stop interrupting meaning with volume.

About Author /

Deepika Rai is a writer, painter, and researcher. Her short stories have appeared in esteemed publications such as The Statesman and The Tribune. With over a decade of experience in painting, she has held four exhibitions and sold more than a hundred artworks. Deepika has also contributed to the world of theatre as a set designer for the play The Doll. Research remains a daily pursuit for her, with a focus on gender studies. Art has always been at the core of her life, and she is currently dedicated to the philosophy of liberation through art, embodied in her project’s tagline, “Ab Jeevan Ki Palette Tumhare Haath.”

1 Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Start typing and press Enter to search